Категория: Бизнес

Релиз: 16.01.2012

Обновлено: 17.07.2017

Версия: 1.2.0

Размер: 11.8 МБ

Разработчик: Toyota Material Handling, USA, Inc.

©2011 Toyota Material Handling, U.S.A., Inc.

Возраст 4+

Совместимость: iPad 74, iPad 73, iPad 72, iPad 71, iPad 612, iPad 611, iPhone 7Plus, iPhone 7, iPhone SE, iPad Pro97 Cellular, iPad Pro97, iPad Pro Cellular, iPad Pro, iPad Mini 4 Cellular, iPad Mini 4, iPhone 6sPlus, iPhone 6s, iPod TouchSixthGen, iPad Mini 3 Cellular, iPad Mini 3, iPad Air 2 Cellular, iPad Air 2, iPhone 6Plus, iPhone 6, iPad Mini Retina Cellular, iPad Mini Retina, iPad Air Cellular, iPad Air, iPhone 5s, iPhone 5c, iPad Mini 4G, iPad Mini, iPad FourthGen 4G, iPad FourthGen, iPod TouchFifthGen, iPhone 5, iPad ThirdGen 4G, iPad ThirdGen, iPhone 4S, iPad 2 3G, iPad 2 Wifi, iPod TouchFourthGen, iPod TouchThirdGen, iPhone 4, iPad 3G, iPad Wifi, iPhone 3GS

Показать все


Spending too much money on fuel for your forklift and wasting valuable run time? Calculate your costs and your productivity by downloading the Toyota Forklift Fuel Efficiency Calculator.

This calculator measures forklift:

Fuel Efficiency

- Fuel gallons per hour per unit
- Fuel costs per hour, day, week and year per unit
- Fuel efficiency improvement
- Fuel cost savings per unit per year
- Fleet fuel cost savings per year

Run Time Improvement Per LPG Tank

- Run time per tank
- Run time per tank improvement (minutes)
- Run time per tank improvement

Speed Advantage Per Cycle

- Average time per cycle
- Performance advantage – each cycle
- Average Cycles per work day (cycles)
- Performance advantage (additional cycles per day)
- Performance advantage per work day

2011 Toyota, Material Handling, U.S.A., Inc.

Fuel Efficiency and Productivity information and rankings derived directly from independent 3rd party test data (Reference USAC Properties, Inc. Certification No. 11‐CPC‐249). Efficiency rankings based on LPG fuel consumed per hour. Productivity rankings based on two criteria: Run time per LPG tank and cycles completed per work day. All lift trucks were configured with LPG fuel systems meeting 2011 EPA and CARB emission requirements and driven less than 600 hours. The following equivalently equipped models were used in the USAC test: Toyota 8FGCU25 with Toyota 4Y‐ECS 2.2L Engine, Nissan CF50LP with Nissan K21 2.1L engine, Yale GLC050VX with Mazda F2 2.2L engine, Caterpillar 2C5000 with Nissan K25 2.5L engine. Results for the Hyster S50FT, Nissan CFU50LP with K25 engine (Power & Soft Mode) and Mitsubishi FGC25N with K21 engine (Power Mode) were derived from the Yale GLC050VX, Caterpillar 2C5000 with K25 engine (Power & Soft Mode) and Nissan CF50LP with K21 engine (Power Mode) test results, respectively since they share the same platform and powertrain.
Показать все

Что нового в версии 1.2.0

iOS 6 and iPhone 5 Support
Improved Performance

Скриншоты (iPhone)